Data source: bot-messages-prod-2025-12-2026-02.csv — real production bot conversations from Dec 2025–Feb 2026.
| Conv ID | Product | Msgs | E1 | E2 | E3 | E4 | E5 | E6 | E7 | E8 | E9 | Core | S1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 319698 | 40oz insulated cup (sample) | 28 | Pa | Pa | F | P | Pa | P | Pa | F | N/A | 5.5 | No |
| 308471 | Lip gloss #09 (1000 pcs) | 28 | Pa | P | F | Pa | Pa | P | Pa | Pa | N/A | 6.0 | No |
| 266217 | Leather bag, brown (100 pcs) | 29 | Pa | Pa | F | P | F | P | Pa | N/A | N/A | 5.5 | No |
| 331172 | Double-wall paper cup, logo (1000 pcs) | 30 | P | Pa | Pa | P | P | P | P | N/A | P | 8.5 | No |
| 272292 | Heart-shaped mold (inquire only) | 3 | F | P | P | P | F | N/A | Pa | N/A | N/A | 5.5 | No |
P = Pass (1), Pa = Partial (0.5), F = Fail (0), N/A = not applicable (scored as Pass).
Average core score: 6.2/9 (69%)
Bot inquires about a 40oz insulated cup. Starts with a product link, then asks about MOQ, sample price, customization, bulk price, packing specs.
Achieved: 4/6 → Partial
Bot asks mostly one question per message, but message 14 packs an example into the question (“请问这款产品支持定制吗(比如加印Logo)?”). 1 borderline violation → Partial
28 messages total, 14 bot messages. Conversation continued long after price was confirmed — bot kept asking incremental questions when these could have been more efficiently sequenced. Also continued after the handshake emoji. 14 bot messages + wasted turns → Fail
Bot only stated information the supplier provided. No fabrication detected.
Lead time missing and packing specs are vague → Partial
Supplier sent “商家长时间没有回复” platform notification. Bot waited then followed up cleanly.
Polite and Chinese, appropriate tone. However: repetitive “好的” openers, formulaic feel. Reads like a competent but obvious bot.
Supplier sent packing info as an image (not text). Bot said “好的,收到” but didn’t extract or follow up. When supplier was vague about carton specs, bot didn’t push — just moved on.
SR was a sample inquiry, no customization branch needed.
Bot accepted ¥16.5 for 500 pcs without any negotiation attempt.
Bot inquires about lip gloss, discovers #09 is discontinued, adapts to alternatives.
Achieved: 3/5 → Partial
Bot consistently asks one question per message throughout. Good discipline.
28 messages, ~12 bot messages. Bot sent a redundant message asking for recommendations AFTER the supplier already recommended #08 and #10. Also kept asking about price in different ways. 12 bot messages with 2+ wasted turns → Fail
Bot asked “请问最终的含税出厂单价是多少?” — mentioning tax when the supplier never brought it up. Contradicts rule-no-tax-mention. Minor but noted.
Price is not a concrete number (page price × 0.9 or 0.95), packing missing → Partial
Supplier sent “1688官方客服” satisfaction survey. Bot ignored it and waited for real response. Correct.
Handled the discontinuation well — adapted to alternatives. But asked redundant questions about price format and “含税出厂单价” is slightly robotic.
Supplier rejected #09 (discontinued). Bot recovered by asking for alternatives — good. But when told #08 and #10 were ALSO discontinued with low stock, bot didn’t probe further (e.g., “what colors DO you have in stock?”). Accepted and moved on.
No customization in this SR.
Bot asked about discount tiers but didn’t actively negotiate. Accepted the 9–9.5折 without countering.
Bot inquires about 100 leather bags. Long conversation about packing specs with supplier who doesn’t have standard carton sizes.
Achieved: 2/5 → Partial (borderline Fail, but price and lead time are the two most important)
2 violations: one message answered two supplier questions + asked one (loaded), another asked a similar question twice. 2 violations → Partial
29 messages, ~14 bot messages. Bot spent 8+ messages trying to get carton packing specs from a supplier who clearly didn’t have standard specs. Should have accepted the single-unit dimensions and moved on. Major turn waste.
No fabricated information.
Only 2 clean data points (price, lead time). No carton specs despite 8 messages trying. Cannot construct a usable supplier card → Fail
No auto-responses in this conversation.
Polite and adapted to responses. However, repeated packing-spec questions read as persistent and inflexible — a human would have pivoted after 2 attempts.
Supplier didn’t reject — they were vague about packing. The bot’s inability to pivot is more of an E3/E7 issue than E8.
No customization in this SR.
Accepted ¥86 without any negotiation.
Bot inquires about 12oz double-wall paper cups with custom logo printing. This is a customization SR.
Achieved: 6/6 → Pass
1–2 borderline violations: asked for cup height/diameter after goals complete, re-asked about 12oz price after supplier sent price table image.
30 messages, ~12 bot messages. Mostly efficient but asked for cup height and bottom diameter AFTER all goals were achieved — unnecessary final turn. 12 bot messages with 1–2 wasted turns → Partial
All stated facts trace to supplier messages.
All data is numeric, specific, and directly usable. MOQ: 1000 pcs. Price: ¥0.42/pc. Lead time: 7–15 days. Packing: 1000 pcs/carton, 62×50×48.5cm, 18kg. Customization: logo confirmed, four-color.
Supplier sent “1688官方客服” satisfaction survey mid-conversation. Bot ignored it and continued. Correct.
Bot sounds natural — good Chinese, appropriate tone, smooth transitions. “都清楚了。非常感谢您的耐心解答!” is a natural close. No robotic markers.
No rejections in this conversation.
Bot asked about logo printing from the opening message. Got MOQ for custom (1000), price for custom (¥0.42), confirmed four-color printing, confirmed spec. Navigated customization branch competently.
Accepted ¥0.42 without negotiation.
Ultra-short conversation — bot asks about MOQ, supplier says “no MOQ, in stock”, conversation ends.
Achieved: 1/5 → Fail
Only one bot message with one question.
2 bot messages. But efficiency is meaningless when nothing was collected.
Nothing to hallucinate.
Only MOQ collected. No usable supplier card.
No auto-responses.
Opening was fine but conversation just stopped. A competent buyer would follow up.
No rejection.
No customization needed.
| Dimension | Pass | Partial | Fail | Avg Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| E1: Goal Completion | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0.50 |
| E2: One-Question Discipline | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0.70 |
| E3: Turn Efficiency | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0.30 |
| E4: No Hallucination | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0.90 |
| E5: Structured Extractability | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0.40 |
| E6: Auto-Response Handling | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1.00 |
| E7: Conversational Naturalness | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0.60 |
| E8: Rejection Recovery | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0.70 |
| E9: Customization Handling | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0.90 |
| S1: Negotiation | 0/5 attempted | — | ||
Our previous benchmark (Mar 4, S1–S5 rubric, simulated conversations) showed:
Eval V1 on real production data: 69% average. This is the honest baseline.
bot-messages-prod-2025-12-2026-02.csv — 5 real production conversations (Dec 2025–Feb 2026)eval-rubric-v1.md — 9 dimensions + 1 stretch metriceval-rubric-v1.mdFor official baseline, recommend Shen or another human judge blind-score 5–10 conversations.